Bhawanand Labh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No 5261 of 2015 =========================================================== Bhawanand Labh. Son of Late Jay Narayan Labh, Resident of Village - Gorapatti, P.S.- Ashok Paper Mill, District - Darbhanga. At present Mohalla - Patel Chowk, Ward No. 7, Kabraghat, P.S.- L.N.M.U. Campus, District - Darbhanga. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Secretary Revenue Board, Bihar Land Records & Measurement Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Director, Land Records & Measurement Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3. The Accountant General, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

4. The Land Settlement Officer, Darbhanga.

5. The Land Settlement Officer, Saharsa.

6. The Assistant Land Settlement Officer, Darbhanga.

7. The Assistant Land Settlement Officer, Saharsa. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr Sanjeev Kumar Jha, Advocate For the S t a t e : Mr Mujtabaul Haque, GP XII with Mr Vasant Vikas, AC to GP XII =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE MADHURESH PRASAD ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 27-08-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the respondent-State.

2 It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that some of the grievances of the petitioner have been redressed. Benefit on account of admitted MACP, leave encashment and gratuity have been paid to the petitioner. It is also submitted by the respondent-State that accordingly the pensionary dues of the petitioner have also been fixed. Petitioner's learned counsel disputes the benefits given under certain heads. He submits that some of the

Patna High Court CWJC No.5261 of 2015 dt.27-08-2018 2/2 benefits made available as per the decision of the authorities communicated in the counter affidavit are disputed. He submits that the petitioner is entitled to the Grade Pay of Rs 4,800/- and that his pension has also not been properly fixed. He submits that for these issues, he will submit a representation to respondent No 4. 3 If such representation is filed within a period of four weeks from today, respondent No 4 would be obliged to consider the same as per admissibility of the petitioner and pass a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law within a period of eight weeks thereafter.

4 Writ petition is disposed of.

(Madhuresh Prasad, J) M.E.H./- AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date 29.08.2018 Transmission Date NA