Suprita Kumari And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.41632 of 2018 ======================================================

1. Suprita Kumari, W/o Rajesh Kumar ,

2. Navin Raut S/o Rajgir Raut, Both are Residents of Vill.- Simari, P.S.- Simari, District- Darbhanga.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Girish Chandra Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sri Dinesh Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 13-08-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, the informant as well as the State.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in Simari P.S. Case No. 99/2016, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 406, 407, 420, 421, 422, 423 and 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code.

It is alleged against the petitioners that they have embezzled money of different schemes of government. It is further alleged that petitioner no. 2 had taken passbook of Baijnath Pathak and withdrawn money for which complaint had been filed by Rekha Devi and Maho Devi on which basis Simri P.S. Case No. 193/2012 and 198/2012 were instituted.

The enquiry report, submitted by the Additional

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.41632 of 2018 (3) dt.13-08-2018 2/2 Collector, Establishment, is part of the F.I.R., which is available at running page 12-15. The detail of irregularities committed by this petitioner has been mentioned in enquiry report. The enquiry officer has found allegation of embezzlement of government money against the petitioners true. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners is rejected.

(Sanjay Priya, J.) Rakhi U T