← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./40460/2018dismissed

Anant Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2018-08-10Mr. Justice Vinod Kumar Sinha2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.40460 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -14 Year- 2018 Thana -MAHESHKHUNT District- KHAGARIA ======================================================

1. Anant Kumar Singh, S/o Braj Nandan Singh, Resident of VillageJamunipur Charch (Maner), P.S.- Maner, District- Patna. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ranjeet Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Smt. Sucheta Yadav ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 10-08-2018 Heard the parties.

The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Maheshkuth P.S.Case No.14 of 2018 dated 29.1.2018 G.R.No.213 of 2018 registered for offences punishable under Sections 420 and 406 of the Indian Penal Code.

Allegation against the petitioner is that he has transferred Rs.40,000/- from the account of the informant to his own account. It further appears that the informant had gone to the ATM Centre but he could not manage the ATM Machine and one person operated the ATM Machine and money was transferred and later on from the enquiry the informant came to know about the hands of the petitioner and his case is that the petitioner has transferred the amount from his account to his own account.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.40460 of 2018 (3) dt.10-08-2018 2/2 Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner is that though amount in the account of the petitioner was transferred but it was withdrawn immediately and the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case and he is ready to deposit the amount. Heard learned A.P.P. also.

Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as stated above, this is not a case for grant of anticipatory bail rather let the petitioner surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from the date of order and make prayer for regular bail, which will be considered by the learned court below on its own merit without being prejudiced by the order of this Court and if the petitioner is ready to deposit the amount on some reasonable time was granted to him, the learned court below will also consider this aspect of the matter.

With the aforesaid observation, this application is dismissed.

(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) chn/- U T