← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./44066/2025bail granted

Upendra Chaudhary @ Sukendra Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

2025-07-14Mr. Justice Chandra Prakash Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44066 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-60 Year-2025 Thana- BUNIYAD GANJ District- Gaya ====================================================== Upendra Chaudhary @ Sukendra Chaudhary, S/o- Late Mahadeo Chaudhary @ Late Mahade Chaudhari, Village- Mahuar Kalan, Saraswati Bigha, PSBuniyadganj, District- Gaya ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Arvind Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mrs. Anita Kumari, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA PRAKASH SINGH ORAL ORDER 14-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P for the State.

2. The petitioner has preferred this application for grant of regular bail in connection with Buniyadganj P.S. Case No. 60 of 2025 dated 14.02.2025 registered for the offences punishable under Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act.

3. As per the prosecution case, total 5 litres of country made Mahua liquor was recovered from possession of the petitioner at village Saraswati Bigha.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in this case on the basis of his three criminal antecedents.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44066 of 2025(2) dt.14-07-2025 2/2 Petitioner has no concern with the alleged recovery. Nothing has been recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. The petitioner has three criminal antecedents in which he is on bail as stated in para 3 of the bail petition. The petitioner is in custody since 15.02.2025.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the bail petition of the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as well as the period of custody, the petitioner abovenamed, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs.20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Court concerned/Exclusive Special Judge, Excise-1, Gaya in connection with Buniyadganj P.S. Case No. 60 of 2025.

7. The application stands allowed.

(Chandra Prakash Singh, J) khushbu/- U T