Sazid Khan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46013 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-112 Year-2025 Thana- MANJHAGARH District- Gopalganj ====================================================== Sazid Khan ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Umesh Kumar Singh, Adv.
For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Anil Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 15-09-2025 Heard Mr. Umesh Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Anil Kumar, learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in connection with Manjhagarh P.S. Case No. 112 of 2025 PTN No. 1424 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 103, 61(2)(a) and 64(1) of the B.N.S., 2023.
3. The case of the prosecution is that on 01.04.2025, when all the family members of the informant woke up, they found that her minor daughter, namely Riya Kumari, was missing. They started searching her. At 08:00 AM, the villagers said that the dead body of his daughter was lying in the orchard near Koini market. After this, the informant and his villagers went there and found that the deceased was hanged in a tree. It
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46013 of 2025(3) dt.15-09-2025 2/3 is further alleged that this petitioner has called and said that he has not killed the deceased, but he knows the miscreants.
4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner has submitted that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. He has been falsely implicated in this case. He also submits that the petitioner and the deceased used to play the Free Fire game online and that they had talk with each other, which is apparent from the C.D.R, which has been collected during the investigation. It has also been submitted that save and except the CDR, there is nothing to connect that the petitioner has committed an offense. He further submits that a statement has been made in para 3 of the petition that petitioner has no criminal antecedent and is languishing in judicial custody since 03.04.2025.
5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.
6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this Court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46013 of 2025(3) dt.15-09-2025 3/3 Judicial Magistrate, Gopalganj in connection with Manjhagarh P.S. Case No. 112 of 2025.
(Ashok Kumar Pandey, J) Sudhanshu/- U T