Shyam Sunder Rana v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1835 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-87 Year-2020 Thana- SONO District- Jamui ====================================================== Shyam Sunder Rana Son Of Sahdeo Rana Resident Of Village - Kodadih, P.S.- Sono, Distt.-Jamui.
... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Prabhat Ranjan Singh- Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Ms. Suman Kumari Singh- A.P.P.
====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 15-07-2021 Heard Mr. Prabhat Ranjan Singh, the learned Advocate for the petitioner and Ms. Suman Kumari Singh, the learned APP for the State.
The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in connection with Sono P. S. Case No.87 of 2020, instituted for the offences under Sections 147, 149, 341, 323, 308, 337, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code.
The mother of the informant was assaulted when she had gone to light lamp in the semi constructed house of the informant. When the brother of the informant came for the rescue of his mother, the petitioner is said to have assaulted him on his head by means of hard and blunt substance. The learned Advocate for the petitioner has submitted that the F.I.R. has been registered after four days of the occurrence. The F.I.R. is purported to be written by one person but has been signed by another person.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1835 of 2021(2) dt.15-07-2021 2/2 Apart from this, it has been submitted that the injury report has been prepared after a very long delay and therefore it does not inspire confidence. There is a land dispute between the parties and the informant is unnecessarily staking his claim over the portion of land which is in the possession of the petitioner. Be that as it may, regard being had to the fact that the injuries suffered by one of the victims who has been assaulted by the petitioner is reported to be grievous, I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to him.
The prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner is rejected.
However, if the petitioner surrenders before the Court below and seeks bail, all the above noted facts shall be taken into account and order shall be passed in accordance with law, without being prejudiced by the fact that the present anticipatory bail application has not been entertained by this Court.
(Ashutosh Kumar, J) vikash/- U T