Patna High CourtCR. MISC./24064/2017bail granted

Rakesh Mandal v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2017-07-01Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.24064 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -53 Year- 2012 Thana -MAHILA P.S. District- SAHARSA ====================================================== Rakesh Mandal, Son of Naren Mandal, Resident of Village- Bargaon, P.S. Basnahi, District- Saharsa.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Putul Kumari, Wife of Rakesh Mandal daughter of Jagdish Mandal, resident of Village- Atalkha, P.S Basnahi, District- Saharsa. .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Amarnath Jha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Gopesh Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 01-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel for the State.

In the present case, the petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Saharsa Mahila P.S. Case No. 53 of 2012 (G.R. No. 2085 of 2012) for offence under Sections 498(A), 323 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 3/4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

The petitioner is the husband, it appears that after strained relationship between the parties, the lady has solemnized second marriage and she has been blessed with two children from that wedlock.

Looking to the entire facts and circumstances of the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.24064 of 2017 (2) dt.01-07-2017 case, let the petitioner, namely, Rakesh Mandal, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of four weeks from today, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Sub-Divisional Judicial Magistrate, Saharsa in connection with Saharsa Mahila P.S. Case No. 53 of 2012 (G.R. No. 2085 of 2012), subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C. as also subject to condition that whenever the police will call the petitioner for investigation/interrogation, he will remain present and if he would not present himself, the privilege of grant of anticipatory bail shall be deemed to have been cancelled.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) Rishi/- U T