Dinanath Thakur v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48089 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-35 Year-2023 Thana- BHAGWANGANJ District- Patna ====================================================== DINANATH THAKUR S/O LATE JAGALU THAKUR R/O VillageChiraiyatand, P.S- Karauna, (O.P), Distt.- Jehananbad. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State Of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ajay Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Uma Shankar Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 11-09-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 302, 120B, 201/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per prosecution case, the informant alleged that on 12.1.2023 his son namely, Rajan Thakur went to his sasural but he did not return. After more than one months on 22.2.2023, one dead body was found which was identified as informant's son. Thereafter, the informant raised suspicion and lodged the FIR against the petitioner along with others regarding commission of murder of his son.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence. After finding the dead body of the deceased, the informant raised only

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48089 of 2023(3) dt.11-09-2023 2/2 suspicion against the petitioner and implicated in the present case. There is no consistent evidence came against the petitioner during course of investigation. No one is eye witness of the alleged occurrence. One co-accused Vinay Thakur confessed his guilt along with the petitioner but confession before police is inadmissible in the eye of law. The entire prosecution hinges around suspicion only. It is further submitted that the petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 25.2.2023.

5. Learned APP appearing for the state has opposed the prayer of regular bail.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as custody of the petitioner, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be released on bail in connection with Bhagwanganj P.S. Case No. 35 of 2023 on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned J.M. 1st Class, Masaurhi/concerned Court. (Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) Amandeep/- U T