← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./44289/2019bail granted

Raja Kumar Chaudhary @ Kaliya v. The State Of Bihar

2019-07-22Mr. Justice Sanjay Priya2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44289 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-889 Year-2018 Thana- DANAPUR District- Patna ====================================================== RAJA KUMAR CHAUDHARY @ KALIYA S/o Subhash Chaudhary R/o Moh.- Bhattha Road Tarigodam, Panchochak, Panchvati Nagar, P.S.- Danapur, P.O.- Danapur Cantt, District- Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sujeet Kumar Gupta For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ramchandra Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 22-07-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in Danapur P.S. Case No. 889 of 2018, instituted for the offence under Section(s) 25(1-B) a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

It is alleged in the written report that one country made pistol and one live cartridge have been recovered from possession of the petitioner.

Petitioner is in custody since 29.12.2018.

Keeping in view the period spent by the petitioner in custody, prayer of the petitioner for grant of bail is allowed. Let the petitioner above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44289 of 2019(2) dt.22-07-2019 2/2 sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-I, Danapur, in connection with Danapur P.S. Case No. 889 of 2018, subject to the condition that both the bailors will be close relatives of the petitioner with further conditions which are as follows: (i) Petitioner shall cooperate in the trial and shall be present on each and every date fixed by the court (ii) In absence on two consecutive dates without any valid reason, the bail bonds of the petitioner will liable to be cancelled and (iii) if petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that event, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J) S.Ali/- U T