Parduman Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.50642 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-49 Year-2025 Thana- BARHIYA District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== Parduman Kumar S/o Radheshyam Singh R/o Village- Dariyapur, P.S.- Barahiya, Distt- Lakhisarai ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Rajnish Chandra, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Ajit Kumar, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PURNENDU SINGH ORAL ORDER 11-08-2025 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks pre-arrest bail in connection with Barahiya P.S. Case No. 49 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115, 109(1), 351(2), 352, 303(2) and 3(5) of the BNS.

3. As per the allegation made in the F.I.R., the accused persons including the petitioner are said to have fired on the informant and his brothers and also assaulted them.

4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is innocent and he has committed no offence as alleged in the F.I.R. The allegation levelled against the petitioner is not specific rather general and omnibus. There is case and counter case between the parties due

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50642 of 2025(2) dt.11-08-2025 2/2 to land dispute.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of pre-arrest bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the nature of allegation made against the petitioner to be general and omnibus, the petitioner, above named, is directed to be released on pre-arrest bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of four weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned District and Additional Sessions Judge-III, Lakhisarai in connection with Barahiya P.S. Case No. 49 of 2025, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438(2) Cr.P.C / 482(2) BNSS.

7. The District Court is directed to verify the criminal antecedent of the petitioner and if it is found that the petitioner is involved in some other cases as what has been stated in Para3 of the bail petition, this order will automatically lose its force.

8. The bail application stands disposed of.

(Purnendu Singh, J) mantreshwar/- U T