Patna High CourtCR. MISC./50343/2025dismissed

Deepak Kumar Sahani v. The State Of Bihar

2026-01-31Mr. Justice Nawneet Kumar Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.50343 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-93 Year-2025 Thana- GOVINDGANJ District- East Champaran ====================================================== Deepak Kumar Sahani S/o Ram Ekbal Sahani R/o Village- Bhataha, P.S.- Motihari (Muffasil), District- East Champaran Present Address- VillageTikuliya, P.S.- Turkauliya, District- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Vikash Kumar Shukla, Adv.

For the State :

Mr.Shailendra Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE NAWNEET KUMAR PANDEY ORAL ORDER 31-01-2026 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned APP for the State.

2. In this case, the petitioner is seeking regular bail in connection with Govindganj P.S. Case No. 93 of 2025, registered for the offences punishable under Section 111 of BNS and sections 20(B)(II)C, 29 of NDPS Act.

3. According to the prosecution case, a truck bearing registration number BR06GC8705 was intercepted, which was being driven by the petitioner. 332.5 kilograms of ganja were recovered from the said truck.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated. He is under custody since 22.04.2025 and is merely

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50343 of 2025(6) dt.31-01-2026 2/2 alleged to be the driver of the truck wherefrom the ganja was recovered. He has also submitted that the procedure of search and seizure was not followed.

5. On the other hand, Mr. Shailendra Kumar, the learned APP for the State has opposed the prayer for bail by submitting that the petitioner was arrested at the spot. The FSL report shows that the recovered contraband is ganja, which is in commercial quantity.

6. Considering the above-mentioned facts and circumstances, the petitioner doesn't deserve the privileges for bail. Accordingly, it is rejected.

7. The learned trial court is directed to take endeavor for early conclusion of the trial.

(Nawneet Kumar Pandey, J) kundan/- U T