Anirudh Panjiyar And ORS v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.50336 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -64 Year- 2018 Thana -PIPRA District- SUPAUL ======================================================
1. Anirudh Panjiyar Son of late Bhulan Panjiyar
2. Indu Panjiyar Son of late Bhulan Panjiyar
3. Sanjay Panjiyar Son of late Bhulan Panjiyar
4. Raj Kumar@ Raju Kumar Son of Anirudh Panjiyar
5. Sarswati Devi @ Saroj Devi wife of Anirudh Panjiyar
6. Anita Devi Wife of Indu Panjiyar
7. Jageshwari Devi Wife of Sanjay Panjiyar
8. Ranjan Kumari@ Ranjan Devi D/o Anirudh Panjiyar
9. Kiran Kumari D/o Anirudh Panjiyar All Are Resident of VillageBishanpur, P.S. Pipra, District- Supaul. .... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pramod Mishra, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Dr. Ajeet Kumar, A.P.P. ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 30-08-2018 Heard the parties. The petitioners seek anticipatory bail in connection with Pipra P.S. Case No. 64 of 2018, registered for offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 379, 447 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code.
As per F.I.R., allegation against the petitioners is of assault to the informant and others.
Submission of the learned counsel for the petitioners is that there is a case and counter case between the parties and
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.50336 of 2018 (3) dt.30-08-2018 2/2 injuries are simple in nature. It is also submitted that the petitioners' side also received injuries and they have no criminal antecedents.
Learned A.P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Having heard both sides and in view of the facts and circumstances, as discussed above, let the petitioners, above named on surrender or arrest within six weeks be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-3rd, Supaul in connection with Pipra P.S. Case No. 64 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of Cr.P.C. with condition that one of the bailors of the petitioners shall be a local person having sufficient immovable property within the jurisdiction of the concerned court.
(Vinod Kumar Sinha, J) Sudha/- U T