Patna High CourtCR. MISC./52318/2023dismissed

Dipendra Yadav @ Dipendra Prasad Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

2023-08-09Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.52318 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-42 Year-2017 Thana- MADHUBANI COMPLAINT CASE District- Madhubani ====================================================== 1.

Dipendra Yadav @ Dipendra Prasad Yadav Son of Sita Ram Yadav Resident of village - Birpur, ward no. 4, P.S. - Birpur, Distt. - Supaul 2.

Sunita Devi Wife of Dependra Yadav @ Dipendra Prasad Yadav Proprietor Jalpa Builder Wishariya, Saptari, Nepal, Resident of village - Birpur, ward no. 4, P.S. - Birpur, Distt. - Supaul 3.

Manish Sinha @ Manish Kumar Sinha Son of Late Krishna Prasad Sinha Munshi, Jalpa Builder Wishariya, Saptari, Nepal, Resident of Koshi Colony, ward no. 1, Birpur, P.S. - Birpur, Distt. - Supaul ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar 2.

Ramchandra Prasad Gupta @ Ramchandra Prasad Son of Baidyanath Prasad Gupta Resident of village - Sarisopahi, P.S. - Pandaul, Distt. - Madhubani ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajay Kumar Jha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Suman Kumari Singh, A.P.P.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 09-08-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. This is second anticipatory bail petition. Earlier, the petition, filed for grant of anticipatory bail on behalf of petitioners, stood rejected, vide order dated 18.04.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 7778 of 2023.

3. This application does not reveal any change of circumstances or new ground.

4. In view of the recent judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of G.R. Ananda Babu Vs. State of Tamil Nadu and Anrs reported in 2021 SCC OnLine SC 176,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.52318 of 2023(2) dt.09-08-2023 2/2 the second anticipatory bail on behalf of the petitioners is not maintainable. It is, accordingly, dismissed.

(Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) Navya/- U T