Sunny Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49407 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-67 Year-2025 Thana- BARH District- Patna ====================================================== 1.
Sunny Kumar Son of Lalo Paswan Village -Malahi, Kali Sthan PS -Barh District -Patna 2.
Ranjit Paswan son of Lalo Paswan Village -Malahi, Kali Sthan PS -Barh District -Patna 3.
Ranjay Paswan son of Lalo Paswan Village -Malahi, Kali Sthan PS -Barh District -Patna 4.
Amarjeet Paswan @ Amarjit Kumar son of Lalo Paswan Village -Malahi, Kali Sthan PS -Barh District -Patna ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Arun Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Chandra Sen Prasad Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 11-08-2025
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioners seek bail in anticipation of their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 74, 79, 109, 351(2), 352 read with Section 3(5) of the B.N.S.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are persons with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that petitioners entered her house and acted inappropriately with female members and when her brother
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49407 of 2025(2) dt.11-08-2025 2/3 came to save them, when Ranjit, Sunny and Amarjeet assaulted him by lathi causing injury on head and waist. Further, the injured was referred to P.M.C.H. by the Primary Health Centre.
4. The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have been falsely implicated in the instant by the informant. It is next submitted that from perusal of the allegation as alleged in the FIR with regard to assault, it would manifest that the same is general and omnibus in nature. It is next submitted that on intervention of well-wishers, the parties have compromised. It is also submitted that in the nature of allegation as alleged, no offence under Section 109 of B.N.S. is made out.
5. Learned A.P.P. opposes the anticipatory bail application.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners, above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, are directed to be released on anticipatory bail on their furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate-1, Barh, Patna in connection with
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49407 of 2025(2) dt.11-08-2025 3/3 Barh P. S. Case No.67 of 2025, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
7. The application stands allowed.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) vikash/- U T