Md. Suhaib @ Md. Sohaib v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1748 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-608 Year-2019 Thana- ARA NAGAR District- Bhojpur ====================================================== MD. SUHAIB @ MD. SOHAIB Son of Late Alimuddin Resident of MohallaDudh Katora, P.S.- Ara Town, District- Bhojpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ravindra Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.A.G.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 17-05-2021 This matter is taken up for consideration through Video Conferencing under the orders of Hon'ble the Chief Justice.

Heard both parties.

The petitioner seeks bail in Ara Town P.S. Case No. 608 of 2019, registered for the offence punishable under Section 25(1-b)a/35 of the Arms Act.

As per the prosecution case, several bullets of different specifications, one magazine and three mobiles of different companies have been recovered from the house of this petitioner.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that nothing has been recovered from conscious possession of this petitioner. Charge has already been framed. Petitioner is in custody since

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1748 of 2021(3) dt.17-05-2021 2/2 01.12.2019.

Considering the period of custody, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bhojpur at Ara in connection with Ara Town P.S. Case No. 608 of 2019, subject to following conditions:- (i) The petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the court below.

(ii) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) vinita/- U T