Police Rai @ Amit Rai v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.57067 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-273 Year-2021 Thana- GARKHA District- Saran ====================================================== POLICE RAI @ AMIT RAI S/o- Yogendra Rai Resident of Village- Garkha, P.S.- Garkha, District- Saran at Chapra.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms.Nawal Kishore Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Ms.Sangeeta Sharma, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 05-07-2022 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.P.P. for the State.

The petitioner apprehends his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 323, 307, 380, 448 and 504 of the Indian Penal Code. The informant alleges that this petitioner along with Sukesh Rai caught him and Bhola Bharti stabbed him twice in his stomach and the reason for the occurrence is that the land of the informant was conveyed to Sunil Manjhi by Jawahar Manjhi.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and has been falsely implicated in the present case, the allegation against him is that he caught the informant and Bhola Bharti stabbed him twice,

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57067 of 2021(2) dt.05-07-2022 2/3 learned counsel draws the attention of the Court to Annexure-2 to the anticipatory bail application to submit that from perusal of the injury report it would manifest that the same records that the injury was caused by blunt object. It is submitted that initially it appears that the injury was recorded as simple and thereafter cutting the word 'simple' it has been recorded as 'opinion reserved', it is thus submitted that the injury report also casts aspersion with regard to the veracity of the allegation but the fact is that the cause of injury is recorded as caused by blunt object which does not corroborate with the allegation as alleged in the F.I.R.

Learned A.P.P. for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioner.

Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Garkha P.S. Case No. 273 of 2021 subject to the conditions as laid down

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.57067 of 2021(2) dt.05-07-2022 3/3 under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Satyavrat Verma, J) Rishi/- U T