Shashi Kumar Yadav @ Shashi Kumar @ Ajit Kumar v. State Of Bihar And ANR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.30977 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1187 Year- 2015 Thana -COMPLAINT CASE District- ARRARIA ======================================================

1. Shashi Kumar Yadav @ Shashi Kumar @ Ajit Kumar, Son of Surendra Yadav, Resident of Mohalla- Ward No.13, P.O.- Mowjaha, Panchayat Kharshahi, P.S.- Raniganj, District- Araria.

.... .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Rani Devi, Daughter of Jagdish Yadav, Resident of Village- Mowjaha, Ward No.13, P.O.- Mowjaha, Panchayat Kharshahi, P.S.- Raniganj, District- Araria.

.... .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Anil Kumar Sinha, Adv. For the Opposite Parties : Mr. Umeshnand Pandit, APP 187 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 13-07-2017 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

This is a petition for grant of anticipatory bail for offence under Sections 498A/34 and 379 of the Indian Penal Code and 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.

The petitioner is husband of opposite party no. 2. There is allegation of demand of dowry and torture for the same. In paragraph 10 of the petition it has been stated that the petitioner is ready for amicable settlement of dispute and restoration of conjugal life.

In the circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender, within four weeks from the date of receipt of this order, be released on provisional anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.30977 of 2017 (2) dt.13-07-2017 2/2 ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Complaint Case No. 1187(C) of 2015 to the satisfaction of the Subdivisional Judicial Magistrate, Araria, or successor Court, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code and, further, with the condition that the Court below shall notice the parties and take necessary steps for amicable settlement. If the petitioner would be found cooperative in the settlement of dispute and willing for restoration of conjugal life, then, the provisional anticipatory bail shall be confirmed by the Court below, itself, otherwise necessary order would be passed according to law.

(Birendra Kumar, J) SA/- U √ T √