Rajesh Ranjan v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.50910 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-580 Year-2023 Thana- BIDUPUR District- Vaishali ====================================================== Rajesh Ranjan Son of Satyadev Yadav R/O Vill. and Post.- Raima, P.S.- Sahar Ghat, Dist.- Madhubani ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Dhirendra Prasad Sinha, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Anil Kumar Singh No. 1, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 20-08-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned APP for the State.
2. The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 324, 307, 504 and 506 of the IPC in connection with Bidupur P.S. Case No.580 of 2023.
3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is a person with clean antecedent and the informant alleges that on 29.09.2023 at about 7-8 AM while she was going to her home after taking leave of one day from duty, when she was intercepted by her husband (petitioner) who assaulted her by knife causing injury as she refused to go with him.
4. The learned counsel submits petitioner has been falsely implicated in the instant case by the informant who is his wife and is a police personnel. It is also submitted that though
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50910 of 2024(2) dt.20-08-2024 2/3 informant alleges that she was assaulted by knife by the petitioner, but then from perusal of the injury report it would manifest that the injury was caused by hard and blunt substance, which belies the allegation of assault by knife, it is fairly submitted that opinion with regard to the injury is reserved, but then submits that from perusal of the injury report it manifest that the injury must be simple.
5. The learned APP opposes the anticipatory bail application.
6. Considering the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner above-named, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks, is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing bail-bonds in the sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur in connection with Bidupur P.S. Case No.580 of 2023, subject to the conditions laid down under Section 438(2) of the Cr.P.C.
7. However, it is made clear that the learned trial court before accepting the bail bonds of the petitioner shall verify the injury report of the informant and, in the event, if it is
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.50910 of 2024(2) dt.20-08-2024 3/3 found that the injuries suffered by the informant is grievous in nature, in that event, the present anticipatory bail order shall not be given effect to.
8. The application stands allowed.
(Satyavrat Verma, J) Prakash Narayan U T