← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./46810/2022allowed

Idrish Mian v. The State Of Bihar

2023-02-24Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46810 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-23 Year-2022 Thana- INARWA District- West Champaran ====================================================== IDRISH MIAN S/o Late Ishaque Mian Resident of Village- Barwa, P.S.- Inarwa, District- West Champaran.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Umesh Chandra Verma For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Arun Kumar Pandey ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 24-02-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned counsel for the informant and learned APP for the State. The petitioner has prayed for bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 147, 148, 149, 302, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act.

As per allegation in the FIR, on the order of Sadhu Paswan, Awadhesh Paswan caught hold of the brother of the informant and Sadhu Paswan caused injury in his leg. Ravi Paswan opened fire upon him as a result of which he received bullet injury in right side of his chest. Specific allegation against the petitioner is that he was present there armed with farsa and was shouting to cut the informant's brother into pieces.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46810 of 2022(4) dt.24-02-2023 2/2 It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. Specific allegation of opening fire is against Ravi Paswan due to which brother of the informant died. Petitioner has not assaulted to anyone. General and omnibus allegation has been levelled against the petitioner. He is languishing in judicial custody since 12.03.2022.

The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Judicial Magistrate 1st Class, Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Inarwa P.S. Case No. 23 of 2022.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U