Sanoj Sahni v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.3624 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-427 Year-2018 Thana- TAJPUR District- Samastipur ====================================================== SANOJ SAHNI, Son of Vishwanath Sahni Resident of Village- Jitwarpur, Bhuskhara, Indrawara, P.S.- Tajpur (Halai), Distt- Samastipur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Kundan Kumar For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 16-09-2021 Heard Mr. Kundan Kumar, learned advocate for the petitioner and Mr. Jharkhandi Upadhyay, learned APP for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in anticipation of his arrest in connection with Tajpur P. S. Case No. 427 of 2018, dated 05.12.2018, instituted for the offences under Sections 120-B, 147, 148, 149, 307, 323, 341, 379, 386, 387, 427, 436, 458 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 3 and 4 of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908.

The accusation in the F.I.R. is that the accused persons hurled bomb and damaged the office from where

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3624 of 2021(3) dt.16-09-2021 2/3 the work of M/s Laxman Construction was being carried out. The F.I.R. has been lodged by the Site Manager. Apart from this, It has been alleged that the property kept in the aforesaid office was looted away. Many persons have been named in the F.I.R.

but the petitioner has not been named.

He was implicated in this case during the course of investigation when it was found that one of the coaccused persons of this case, namely, Prakash Singh @ Karu Singh had a telephonic talk with him.

The aforesaid Prakash Singh @ Karu Singh has been granted bail by a Bench of this Court.

Apart from this, it has been submitted that there is no other material to connect the petitioner with the alleged offence.

The petitioner earlier was made accused in three cases. But all those cases are different in nature and genre from the present/subject F.I.R. In all such cases, the petitioner is on bail.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.3624 of 2021(3) dt.16-09-2021 3/3 Considering the afore-stated aspects of the matter, the petitioner, above-named, is directed to be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the court below within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt / production of a copy of this order, on his furnishing bail bonds in the sum of Rs. 10,000 /- (Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Samastipur, in connection with Tajpur P. S. Case No. 427 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) Cr.P.C. The application stands allowed.

(Ashutosh Kumar, J) skm/- U T