Gajendra Kumar @ Rajnish Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47603 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-245 Year-2024 Thana- UDWANTNAGAR District- Bhojpur ====================================================== Gajendra Kumar @ Rajnish Kumar S/o Shailesh Mauar Resident of Village - Situhari, P.S.- Narayanpur, District- Bhojpur at Present resident of village - Satya Shiv Nagar Behind D.P.S. Shool Ara, P.S.- Udawantnagar, DistrictBhojpur ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Prabhat Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Ram Anurag Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJIV ROY ORAL ORDER 22-07-2026 Heard the parties.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Udwantnagar P.S. Case No. 245 of 2024 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 307 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code and section 27 of the Arms Act, lodged on 16.06.2024 by the informant Prem Kumar Tripathi.
3. As per the prosecution story, the informant alleged that while he was sitting at his tiles shop, the accused came on a motorcycle and opened fire. As the informant called DIAL 112, they escaped. This led to the F.I.R.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that only because of criminal antecedent, he has been implicated, there is no supporting evidence in the present case.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47603 of 2026(2) dt.22-07-2026 2/2
5. Learned APP has taken this Court to the learned Sessions Judge order to show that CCTV Footage has been procured and the role of the petitioner has been found. Further, submission is that the matter is of the year 2024 and he has four criminal antecedents.
6. Taking into account the aforesaid facts as also the perusal of the learned Sessions Judge order which records about the details of the case diary, no case of anticipatory bail is made out.
7. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application stands rejected.
(Rajiv Roy, J) vinayak/- U T