Rajan Chaudhary v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.46330 of 2022 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-61 Year-2020 Thana- VALMIKINAGAR District- West Champaran ====================================================== Rajan Chaudhary Son Of Late Lalan Chaudhary R/O Village- Lagunaha Patilar, P.S.- Chautarwa, District- West Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Akhauri Kamal Kishore Sahay For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Nagendra Prasad ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 13-03-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

The petitioner has prayed for regular bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under section 392 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per allegation in the FIR, informant is engaged as Manager in Bharat Finance Ltd. Bagha and on 24.11.2020, while he and his co-worker were returning by a motorcycle after collecting money of Rs. 1,53,525/-, near Dhobaha Pool, two miscreants on a motorcycle overtook them and looted the entire amount, mobile phone and bio-metric machine.

It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. Neither

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.46330 of 2022(4) dt.13-03-2023 2/2 the petitioner is named in the FIR not put on TIP. There is no eye witness of the alleged occurrence. Nothing has been recovered from his conscious possession. Similarly situated other co-accused person, namely, Sajjad Miya has already been granted bail by this Court vide order dated 16.02.2023 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 47082 of 2022. Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 07.03.2022.

The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM 1st, Bagaha, West Champaran in connection with Valmikinagar P.S. Case No. 61 of 2020.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U