Satya Narayan Mehta v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.11936 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-198 Year-2020 Thana- KISHUNPUR District- Supaul ====================================================== 1.

SATYA NARAYAN MEHTA S/O SITA RAM MEHTA RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-SHRIPUR WARD NO.13, SUKHASAN, P.S.-KISHANPUR, DISTRICT-SUPAUL.

2.

KAILU MEHTA @ RAM NARAYAN MEHTA S/O SITA RAM MEHTA RESIDENT OF VILLAGE-SHRIPUR WARD NO.13, SUKHASAN, P.S.- KISHANPUR, DISTRICT-SUPAUL.

... ... Petitioners.

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Kamal Kishore Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Suman Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 14-12-2021 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioners undertakes to remove the defects, as pointed out by the office, within four weeks. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, the office will place the matter before the Bench.

The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 341, 323, 307, 379, 504 & 506/34 of the Indian Penal Code. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that no such occurrence as alleged ever took place.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.11936 of 2021(2) dt.14-12-2021 2/2 Petitioners have been falsely implicated in this case. The allegation levelled against the petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. There is no direct allegation against petitioner no.1, rather the allegation is against his two sons, namely, Manoj Mehta and Apesh Mehta. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, as there is no direct allegation against petitioner no.1, let the above named petitioner no.1, be released on bail, in the event of his arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned lower Court where the case is pending/successor Court in connection with Kishanpur P.S. Case No.198 of 2020, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. As there is direct allegation against petitioner no.2 of assaulting and snatching of Rs.98,000.00, I am not inclined to enlarge petitioner no.2 on anticipatory bail. The prayer for anticipatory bail of petitioner no.2 is hereby rejected. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Trivedi/- U T