Loha Yadav @ Abhay Singh Yadav @ Loha Singh @ Abhay @ Loha Yadav v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43916 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-276 Year-2022 Thana- NAWANAGAR District- Buxar ====================================================== Loha Yadav @ Abhay Singh Yadav @ Loha Singh @ Abhay @ Loha Yadav S/o- Gupteshwar Yadav, R/o- Masahariya P.S.- Murar, Dist- Buxar. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar.

... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Ms. Kahkashan Alam, Advocate.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Satyendra Narayan Singh, APP.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL DUTTA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 29-08-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned A.P.P. for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Nawanagar P.S. Case No.276 of 2022 registered under Sections 30(a), 30(c), 30(d), 33, 34, 36, 41(1) (2) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act.

3. This is the second regular bail application filed on behalf of the petitioner who is in custody since 27.08.2024. Earlier, his prayer for bail was dismissed on merit vide order dated 05.03.2025 passed in Cr. Misc. No.74056 of 2024.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that trial has already been concluded and the case is fixed for judgment.

5. Learned A.P.P. appearing on behalf of the State vehemently opposes the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43916 of 2025(3) dt.29-08-2025 2/2 at this stage and submitted that earlier bail petition of the petitioner was rejected on merit and no fresh ground is made out for grant of bail to the petitioner. He further submits that the petitioner is involved in 23 criminal cases and is a habitual criminal, therefore, the petitioner does not deserves the privilege of regular bail.

6. Having considered the facts and circumstances of the case and earlier the bail petition of the petitioner was rejected on merit as well as the submission on behalf of petitioner that the case is fixed for judgment, this Court is not inclined to grant bail to the petitioner. Accordingly, the bail petition of the petitioner is dismissed.

(Sunil Dutta Mishra, J) Ritik/- U T