Navin Kumar Singh v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.31706 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -1932 Year- 2014 Thana -MUZFFARPUR COMPLAINT CASE District- MUZAFFARPUR ======================================================
1. Navin Kumar Singh, son of Late Ram Vinay Singh, resident of VillageChamrahra, Post- Mahnar Road (R.S.), Police Station- Mahnar, DistrictVaishali .... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Bihar.
2. Lal Babu Singh, son of Satya Narayan Singh, resident of Village- Shikati, Police Station- Kudhani, District- Muzaffarpur .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Angad Kunwar, Adv. For the Opposite Parties : Mr. Braj Kishore Prasad, APP 90 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 13-07-2017 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.
This is a petition for grant of anticipatory bail for offence under Sections 498A and 406 of the Indian Penal Code and 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.
The petitioner is husband of complainant's daughter. There is allegation of demand of dowry and torture for the same. In paragraph 15 of the petition it has been stated that the petitioner is ready for amicable settlement of dispute and restoration of conjugal life.
In the circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender, within four weeks from the date of receipt of this order, be released on provisional anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in connection with Complaint Case No. 1932 of 2014 to the satisfaction of the Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Muzaffarpur, or successor Court, subject to the condition laid down under
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31706 of 2017 (2) dt.13-07-2017 2/2 Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code and, further, with the condition that the Court below shall notice the parties and take necessary steps for amicable settlement. If the petitioner would be found cooperative in the settlement of dispute and willing for restoration of conjugal life, then, the provisional anticipatory bail shall be confirmed by the Court below, itself, otherwise necessary order would be passed according to law.
(Birendra Kumar, J) SA/- U √ T √