Dilip Kumar Chaudhary And ANR v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.52177 of 2018 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -169 Year- 2018 Thana -JAMALPUR District- MUNGER ======================================================
1. Dilip Kumar Chaudhary
2. Arjun Chaudhary @ Arjun Kumar Chaudhary, Both are son of Suresh Chaudhary, resident of Bari Keshopur, Police Station- Jamalpur, District- Munger.
.... .... Petitioner/s
Versus
1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Sunil Kumar Pandey, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 10-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State. The petitioners are apprehending their arrest in a case registered for the offences punishable under Sections 419/420/120B/467/468/471 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 7 of the Lottery Regulation Act.
Submission is that lottery ticket was recovered from the house of co-accused Raj Kumar Chaudhary and on his confessional statement petitioners' name surfaced during investigation. The petitioners have stated on oath that they have got no criminal antecedent.
Considering the aforesaid fact, let the
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.52177 of 2018 (3) dt.10-10-2018 P2/ petitioners, above named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the Court below within a period of thirty days from the date of receipt of the order, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.20,000/- (Twenty Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court-below where the case is pending in connection with Jamalpur Police Station Case No. 169 of 2018, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure as well as condition that the petitioners shall fully cooperate with the investigation/trial of the case, failing which the court below shall be at liberty to cancel the bail bond of the petitioners. (Birendra Kumar, J) Mkr./- U T