Patna High CourtCR. MISC./31106/2017dismissed

Naresh Sahni And ANR v. The State Of Bihar

2017-07-13Mr. Justice Ashwani Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.31106 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -41 Year- 2017 Thana -MALSALAMI District- PATNA ======================================================

1. Naresh Sahni, son of Late Ramashish Sahni,

2. Suraj Sahni, son of Late Rajdhari Sahni, Both are resident of Mohalla- Didarganj Halt, P.S.- Malsalami, DistrictPatna. .... .... Petitioners

Versus

The State of Bihar. .... .... Opposite Party ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sudhir Kumar, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Pradeep Narain Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 13-07-2017 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State.

2. Apprehending their arrest in connection with Malsalami P.S. Case No. 41 of 2017 registered for the offences under Sections 272, 273/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 30(a) of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act, 2016, the petitioners have filed the present application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of pre-arrest bail.

3. In view of the provision prescribed under subsection (2) of Section 76 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Act,

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31106 of 2017 (2) dt.13-07-2017 2 / 2 2016 (for short 'the Act') as also in view of the order dated 07.07.2017 passed by this Court in the matter of Ashok Sahani Vs. State of Bihar (Cr. Misc. No. 26109 of 2017), I am of the considered opinion that an application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 would not be maintainable in any case involving the arrest of any person on accusation of offence committed under 'the Act'.

4. Hence, the present application filed under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for grant of prearrest bail to the petitioners in a case involving accusation of offence committed under 'the Act' is disposed of as not maintainable.

(Ashwani Kumar Singh, J.) Sanjeet/- U T