Patna High CourtCR. MISC./31124/2017bail granted

Bhushan Kumar @ Bhushan Kumar Singh v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2017-07-13Mr. Justice Birendra Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.31124 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -268 Year- 2013 Thana -VAISALI COMPLAINT CASE DistrictVAISHALI(HAJIPUR) ======================================================

1. Bhushan Kumar @ Bhushan Kumar Singh, Son of Dipu Singh, Resident of Village- Jarang Rampur Pashchim Tola, P.S.- Belsar O.P. (Vaishali), District- Vaishali .... Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

2. Chunchun Kumari, daughter of Dewdhari Singh, wife of Bhushan Kumar, presently residing at Hajpura, P.S.- Belsar O.P. (Vaishali), DistrictVaishali .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner : Mr. Mukesh Kumar Jha, Adv. For the Opposite Parties : Mr. Binod Kumar, APP 16 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 13-07-2017 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.

This is a petition for grant of anticipatory bail for offence under Sections 323, 379, 406 and 498A of the Indian Penal Code and 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The petitioner is husband of opposite party no. 2. There is allegation of demand of dowry and torture for the same. In paragraph 9 of the petition it has been stated that the petitioner is ready for amicable settlement of dispute and restoration of conjugal life.

In the circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender, within four weeks from the date of receipt of this order, be released on provisional anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31124 of 2017 (2) dt.13-07-2017 2/2 connection with Complaint Case No. C-268 of 2013 to the satisfaction of the Subdivisional Judicial Magistrate, Vaishali at Hajipur, or successor Court, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code and, further, with the condition that the Court below shall notice the parties and take necessary steps for amicable settlement. If the petitioner would be found cooperative in the settlement of dispute and willing for restoration of conjugal life, then, the provisional anticipatory bail shall be confirmed by the Court below, itself, otherwise necessary order would be passed according to law. (Birendra Kumar, J) SA/- U √ T √