Patna High CourtCWJC/9265/2016dfd for non appearance

Fatehpur Pakari Panchayat Primary Agriculture Credit Cooperative Society Ltd. And ANR v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-11-27Mr. Justice Ashwani Kumar Singh2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.9265 of 2016 ======================================================

1. Fatehpur Pakari Panchayat Primary Agriculture Credit, CoOperative Society Ltd, Fatehpur Through Its Chairman , Shiv Narayan Prsad Mishra.

2. Shiva Narayan Prasad Mishra, Son Of Ram Sewak Mishra, R/OVill- Chand Sarai, P.S.- Mahua, District- Vaishali At Hazipur, Chairman, Fatehpur Pakari Panchayat Pacs, Fatehpur Under Mahua Block, District, Vaishali.

... ... Petitioners

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through its Principal Secretary, Co-operative Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Bihar, Patna.

3. The Joint Registrar, Co-operative Societies, Tirhut Division, Muzaffarpur.

4. District Co-operative Officer, Vaishali at Hazipur.

5. The Vaishali District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd, Hazipur, through its Managing Director.

6. The Managing Director, The Vaishali District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd, Hazipur.

7. Vishundeo Rai, s/o- Late Dwarika Rai, Chairman of the Vaishali District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd, Hazipur.

8. Raghuvansh Narain Singh, Vice-Chairman of the Vaishali District Central Cooperative Bank Ltd, Hazipur.

9. Ram Kishore Prasad Singh

10. Mushafir Sahani.

11. Krishna Deo Singh

12. Shailendra Kumar Pandey

13. Shiya Ram Rai

14. Srimati Aradhna Devi

15. Sunil Kumar

16. Sudhi Ranjan Prasad

17. Jago Lal Paswan

Patna High Court CWJC No.9265 of 2016(3) dt.27-11-2018 2/2

18. Dr. Prem Kumar.

... ... Respondents ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner :

None For the Respondent :

Mr. Manish Kumar- GP-8 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 27-11-2018 Despite repeated calls, nobody appears for the petitioners.

Learned counsel for respondent nos. 5 and 6 are present.

The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution. (Ashwani Kumar Singh, J) kanchan/- U