Sarvanand Singh v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.1393 of 2016 ====================================================== Sarvanand Singh Son of Ram Nath Singh, Resident of Village - Nikanth Tola, Goraiyasthan, P.O. Byapur, P.S. Maner District - Patna. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development Department Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Director, Primary Education, Bihar, Patna.

3. The District Education Officer, Patna.

4. The District Programme Officer (Establishment), Patna.

5. The Block Education Officer, Danapur, Patna.

6. The Headmaster Primary School Akilpur, Danapur, Patna.

7. The Mukhiya, Akilpur Panchayat, P.O. & P.S. Akilpur, District Patna.

8. The Panchayat Secretary, Akilpur Panchayat, P.O. & P.S. Akilpur District - Patna.

9. Lagandeo Roy, Son of Ramanuj Rai, Resident of Village Batrawali, P.S. Akilpur, District Patna.

... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Amar Nath Singh For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Purnendu Singh- Gp27 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 19-03-2018 It appears that in the order dated 6.3.2018 some discrepancies have been pointed out by the learned counsel for the petitioner. Hence, the order dated 6.3.2018 shall now be read as follows:- "Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel appearing for the State.

Counsel for the petitioner referring to Annexure-G submits that the District Programme Officer (Establishment), Patna has already issued direction to the Panchayat Secretary-cum-Members Secretary Panchayat Employment

Patna High Court CWJC No.1393 of 2016(5) dt.19-03-2018 2/2 Unit, Akilpur Danapur, Patna on 22.02.2018.

In view of the letter dated 22.02.2018, the petitioner submits that the District Programme Officer has already issued direction for cancellation of the certificates to respondent Lagandeo Rai and in his place for appointment of the petitioner in the light of the decision in LPA No. 405 of 2016 dated 30.11.2017. In view of the above, there is absolutely no occasion for this court to pass any further order. It is expected that the respondent-authority will act upon letter No.1416 dated 22.02.2018 and take necessary steps for appointment of the petitioner. Necessary action in this regard may be taken by the respondent-authority within 60 days from the date of receipt/production of a copy of this order.

With the aforesaid, this writ application is disposed of."

Ravi/- (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) U