← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/6076/2015dismissed

Rakesh Ranjan Tiwari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-11-27Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay1 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.6076 of 2015 ====================================================== Rakesh Ranjan Tiwari. S/o Shri Shree Nath Tiwari. Resident of Village - Pakariya, P.O.- Majhariya Kishun, P.S.+ Via - Jadishpur (Nautan), Block - Nautan, District - West Champaran, Bihar. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar, through the Principal Secretary, Department of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Department of Education, Bihar, Patna.

3. The Collector-cum-District Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran.

4. The District Education Officer, Bettiah, West Champaran.

5. The Block Education Officer, Nautan Block, Nautan, District - West Champaran.

6. The Block Development Officer, Nautan Block, Nautan, District - West Champaran.

7. The Director, the Directorate of the State Educational Research and Training, Bihar, Patna.

8. The Deputy Director, the Directorate of the State Educational Research and Training, Bihar, Patna.

9. The Assistant Director, the Directorate of the State Educational Research and Training, Bihar, Patna.

10. The Head of the Department, Department of Teachers Education, the Directorate of the State Educational Research and Training, Bihar, Patna.

11. The Principal, the District Institute of Education & Training (DIET), Kumarbagh, District - West Champaran.

12. Sri Ajay Kumar, the Block Teacher, Government Upgraded Middle School, Jamunia, Nawka Tola, Block - Nautan, District - West Champaran. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Sanjeev Kumar For the Respondent/s :

Smt. Binita Singh- Gp31 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 27-11-2018 In view of the subsequent development i.e. the decision of this Court approved by the Division Bench, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner seek permission to withdraw this writ application.

The writ application is dismissed as withdrawn. (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) Ravi/- U