Amarjeet Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.1754 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-140 Year-2020 Thana- NAUTAN District- West Champaran ====================================================== AMARJEET KUMAR son of Mahendra Sahani RESIDENT OF VILLAGE TALUHA DAROGAJEE KE TOLA, POLICE STATION NAUTAN, DISTRICT- WEST CHAMPARAN ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Sachida Nand Rai For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.A.G.

====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 04-03-2021 Heard both parties.

The petitioner seeks bail in Nautan P.S. Case No. 140 of 2020, registered for the offence punishable under Sections 413, 414 of the Indian Penal Code.

As per the prosecution case, this petitioner was apprehended with stolen motorcycle.

It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Nothing has been recovered from possession of this petitioner. Petitioner is in custody since 08.05.2020 and bears no criminal antecedent. Chargsheet has already been submitted.

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the petitioner above-named, is directed to be enlarged on bail on

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.1754 of 2021(2) dt.04-03-2021 2/2 furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bettiah, West Champaran in connection with Nautan P.S. Case No. 140 of 2020, subject to following conditions:- (i) The petitioner shall co-operate in the trial and shall be properly represented on each and every date fixed by the court and shall remain physically present as directed by the Court and in the event of failure on two consecutive dates without sufficient reasons, his bail bond shall be liable to be cancelled by the court below.

(ii) If the petitioner tampers with the evidence or the witnesses of the case, in that case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail of the petitioner. (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) vinita/- U T