← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./38173/2014bail granted

Dhirendra Yadav @ Dhirendra Kumar Dinkar v. The State Of Bihar

2015-03-02Justice Smt. Anjana Mishra2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.38173 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -17 Year- 2006 Thana -RAGHOPUR District- SUPAUL ====================================================== Dhirendra Yadav @ Dhirendra Kumar Dinkar S/o Late Parsuram Yadav @ Parsuram Prasad Resident of village- Chknapatti, P.S.- Raghopur, DistrictSupaul. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Sanjay Kumar @ S.K. For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Lallan Kumar(App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE JUSTICE SMT. ANJANA MISHRA ORAL ORDER 02-03-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the State.

The petitioner is in custody since 24.02.2014 in a case for the offence registered under Sections 399, 402, 353, 307 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act. It is submitted on behalf of the petitioner that though the petitioner was not arrested from the place of occurrence but his name was taken by one of the accused persons, who was arrested at the place where, it was alleged that the miscreants had gathered for the purpose of committing dacoity. Save and except the statement made by the

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.38173 of 2014 (3) dt.02-03-2015 2/2 apprehended accused Chandra Bhushan Kumar Yadav, there is no other cogent material on record to connect the petitioner with the offence which is alleged to have been committed. Learned counsel for the petitioner fairly submits that several cases have been lodged against him, details of which have been stated in paragraph-3 of the bail petition. However, learned counsel for the petitioner has placed before this Court the order dated 06.02.2014 passed in Cr. Misc. No. 37862 of 2014 in which the petitioner has been extended the privilege of bail after considering the antecedents of the petitioners and taking in view the allegation of that particular case.

Considering the aforesaid submissions and also the and also the period of custody, let the petitioner, above named be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of S.D.J.M., Birpur (Supaul) in connection with Raghopur P.S. Case No. 17 of 2006 corresponding to G.R. No. 69 of 2006.

(Anjana Mishra, J) Jagdish/- U T