Suresh Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.11775 of 2024 ====================================================== Suresh Kumar Son of Shri Nawab Ram, Panchayat Teacher, Primary School Harnath Dih, Panchayat Bhakura, Tarari, District- Bhojpur, Resident of village- Bhulukuan, P.O.- Basaurhi, P.S.- Piro, District- Bhojpur. ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1.

The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Education, Government of Bihar, Patna.

2.

The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Development, Government of Bihar, Patna.

3.

The Director Primary Education, Human Resources Development Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna, 4.

The District Education Officer, Bhojpur (Ara). 5.

The Block Development Officer, Block-Tarari, District -Bhojpur (Ara). 6.

The Block Education Officer, Block-Tarari, District- Bhojpur. 7.

The Member, District Teachers Employment Appellate Authority, Bhojpur (Ara).

8.

The Mukhiya, Gram Panchayat Raj Bhakura, Block- Tarari, DistrictBhojpur (Ara). 9.

The Panchayat Secretary, Gram Panchayat Raj Bhakura Block-Tarari, District- Bhojpur (Ara).

10.

The Headmaster, Primary School Harnath Dih, Tarari, Bhojpur. ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Surendra Kumar Mishra, Advocate For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Ajay, Government Advocate-5 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 08-08-2024 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

2. The present writ application has been filed for a direction to the respondents to pay salary to the petitioner from the date of joining and further for direction to the respondents to give opportunity for training to him.

Patna High Court CWJC No.11775 of 2024(2) dt.08-08-2024 2/2

3. Learned counsel for the State, at the very outset, submits that virtually the petitioner has filed this writ application for executing the order passed by the District Teachers Appellate Authority for which he has remedy to move before the State Appellate Authority and without availing the said efficacious remedy the petitioner has approached this Court.

4. In such view of the matter, without going into the merits of the case, the petitioner is directed to file an appeal before the State Appellate Authority within four weeks and the State Appellate Authority would pass a reasoned and speaking order in accordance with law after affording opportunity of hearing to the respective parties. The delay, if any, in preferring the appeal shall be condoned by the State Appellate Authority.

5. With the above observation and direction, this writ petition stands disposed of.

(Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) Trivedi/- U