Patna High CourtMJC/1479/2013disposed

Nand Kishore Mehra v. The L.N.Mithila Universtiy, Darbhanga And ORS.

2015-04-24Mr. Justice Rajendra Kumar Mishra2 pages

Patna High Court MJC No.1479 of 2013 dt.24-04-2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Miscellaneous Jurisdiction Case No.1479 of 2013 IN Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 13833 of 2004 =========================================================== NAND KISHORE MEHRA, S/O LATE SHANTA PRASAD MEHRA, R/O PETHIA BAZAR, P.S. DANAPUR CANT, DISTRICT - PATNA .... .... PETITIONER/S

VERSUS

1. THE L.N.MITHILA UNIVERSTIY, DARBHANGA, THROUGH ITS REGISTRAR, NAMELY DR. VIJAY PRASAD SINGH

2. DR. S.P. SINGH, VICE - CHANCELLOR, L.N. MITHILA UNIVERSITY, DARBHANGA

3. MR. S.K. CHOUDHARY, THE F.O., L.N. MITHILA UNIVERSITY, DARBHANGA

4. THE STATE OF BIHAR THROUGH THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, GOVT. OF BIHAR, PATNA, NAMELY MR. AMARJEET SINHA, I.A.S.

5. THE DIRECTOR, DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, GOVERNMENT OF BIHAR, PATNA, NAMELY MR. S.R. SINGH .... .... OPPOSIE PARTY/S =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr.

For the Respondent/s : Mr.

=========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RAJENDRA KUMAR MISHRA ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 24-04-2015 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the opposite parties.

The present contempt application has been filed for noncompliance of the order dated 08.03.2011 passed in C.W.J.C. No. 13833 of 2004 whereunder the aforesaid writ application was disposed of with direction that the petitioner will file a representation before the Vice-Chancellor, Lalit Narayan Mithila

Patna High Court MJC No.1479 of 2013 dt.24-04-2015 University, Darbhanga, who will pass an order for making payment of salary and if the found is not available with the University send a requisition to the State Government with respect to payment of dues of the petitioner who has been regularized vide Annexure 11. It is expected that the said payment would be made expeditiously.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the order of the writ court has already been complied with. Since the order, under contempt, has been complied with by the concerned opposite parties, therefore, no further action is required. Accordingly, this contempt application is disposed of.

(Rajendra Kumar Mishra, J) Bhardwaj/- U