Manjeet Kumar @ Manjit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.47175 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-410 Year-2024 Thana- KESARIA District- East Champaran ====================================================== Manjeet Kumar @ Manjit Kumar S/O Rajesh Sahani Resident of village - Bhatahan, P.S.- Muffasil, District- East Champaran ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ajay Kumar Singh, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Satyendra Narayan Singh, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 30-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Kesariya P.S. Case No. 410 of 2024 instituted for the offences under Section 309(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

3. Prosecution case, in short, is that, three unknown miscreants came on a motorcycle to the informant's gas godown, threatened the informant at gun point, abused him and fled away with Rs. 75,000/- cash, leaving behind their motorcycle.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case. Petitioner is not named in the F.I.R. The name of the petitioner transpired in this case on the basis of disclosure made by the coaccused Rahul Kumar. No incriminating article has been

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.47175 of 2025(2) dt.30-07-2025 2/2 recovered from the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel further submitted that petitioner has got no concern with the looted articles. Learned counsel further submitted that T.I.P. has not been conducted till date. Learned counsel further submitted that no any arms or pistol used in the alleged occurrence has been recovered from this petitioner. It has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner is in custody since 21.03.2025 and has one criminal antecedent.

5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case as also the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Kesariya P.S. Case No. 410 of 2024.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Alok Verma/- U T