← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/7689/2016disposal with observation

Sushil Chandra Tiwari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-10-05Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.7689 of 2016 =========================================================== Sushil Chandra Tiwari Son of Late Lal Pariksha Tiwari, Resident of Village - Karnpura, P.s. & P.O. + Block - Durgawati, District - Kaimur. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary, Health Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, General Administrative Department, Govt. of Bihar, Patna.

3. The State Health Society through its Executive Director, Bihar, Parivar Kalyan Bhawan, Shekhpura, Patna.

4. The District Magistrate - cum - Chairman, District Health Society, Kaimur.

5. The Civil Surgeon - cum - Secretary, District Health Society, Kaimur.

6. The Medical Officer Incharge, Primary Health Centre, Durgawati, Kaimur.

7. The Rogi Kalyan Samiti, Durgawati through its Chairman, Medical Officer, Primary Health Centre, Durgawati, Kaimur.

.... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Gyan Prakash, Advocate For the Respondent/s : Mr. Nashrul Hoda Khan- SC18 =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 05-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the facts of the present case are identical to the case of C.W.J.C. No. 11173 of 2016 (Sanoj Kumar & Ors. Vs. The State of Bihar & Ors.), the aforesaid judgment squarely covers the issue involved in the present case.

In such view of the matter, the concerned authority is directed to examine the facts, law and prayer of the case of the

Patna High Court CWJC No.7689 of 2016 dt.05-10-2018 2 /2 petitioner and if it is found that present case is squarely covered by the aforesaid case, the same benefit should also be extended to the petitioner.

With the aforesaid observations and directions, this writ petition is disposed of.

(Shivaji Pandey, J) Vinay/Sunny AFR/NAFR NAFR CAV DATE NA Uploading Date12.10.2018 Transmission Date NA