Arun Kumar @ Arun Prasad @ Arun v. State Of Bihar And ANR
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Criminal Miscellaneous No.31470 of 2017 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -4311 Year- 2016 Thana -GOPALGANJ COMPLAINT CASE DistrictGOPALGANJ ======================================================
1. Arun Kumar @ Arun Prasad @ Arun Son of Harinand Sah resident oif Village- Ganesh Dumar , Tola- Rajpur,P.S. Bhorey, District- Gopalganj .... Petitioner
Versus
1. The State of Bihar
2. Mintu Devi wife of Arun Kumar Resident of Village- Ganesh Dumar, Tola Rajpur, P.S. Bhorey, District- Gopalganj. Presently residing as Daughter of Mohan Sah, Resident of Village- Husseypur, Baidyanath Tola, P.S. Bhorey, District- Gopalganj .... Opposite Parties ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner : Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pandey No-5, Adv. For the Opposite Parties : Mr. Bisheshwar Ram, APP 18 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BIRENDRA KUMAR ORAL ORDER 13-07-2017 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the State.
This is a petition for grant of anticipatory bail for offence under Sections 323, 498A and 494 of the Indian Penal Code and 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The petitioner is husband of opposite party no. 2. There is allegation of demand of dowry and torture for the same. In paragraph 16 of the petition it has been stated that the petitioner is ready for amicable settlement of dispute and restoration of conjugal life.
In the circumstances, let the petitioner, above named, in the event of his arrest or surrender, within four weeks from the date of receipt of this order, be released on provisional anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.10,000/- (rupees ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each in
Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.31470 of 2017 (2) dt.13-07-2017 2/2 connection with Complaint Case No. 4311 of 2016 (T.R. No. 1972 of 2016) to the satisfaction of the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, VI, Gopalganj, or successor Court, subject to the condition laid down under Section 438(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code and, further, with the condition that the Court below shall notice the parties and take necessary steps for amicable settlement. If the petitioner would be found cooperative in the settlement of dispute and willing for restoration of conjugal life, then, the provisional anticipatory bail shall be confirmed by the Court below, itself, otherwise necessary order would be passed according to law.
(Birendra Kumar, J) SA/- U √ T √