Maksud @ Papan @ Md. Papan v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Criminal Miscellaneous No.38072 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -242 Year- 2013 Thana -LAHERIMUHALLA District- NALANDA (BIHARSHARIFF) ======================================================

1. Md. Jumman Son of Late Rajjak resident of village Bisait, Police Station Maskaur, District Nalanda at present resident of Mohala Gagan Diwan, Police Station Laheri, District Nalanda.

2. Kallu @ Barahil Son of Ali Bax

3. Md. Munna Son of Tikar Mian Both are residents of village / Mohalla Gagan Diwan, Police Station Laheri, District - Nalanda. .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar.

.... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== with Criminal Miscellaneous No.39976 of 2014 Arising Out of PS.Case No. -242 Year- 2013 Thana -LAHERIMUHALLA District- NALANDA (BIHARSHARIFF) ======================================================

1. Maksud @ Papan @ Md. Papan Son of Sahud Resident of Village-Kagzi, P.S.-Bihar, District-Nalanda.

.... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State of Bihar .... .... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

(In Cr.Misc. No.38072 of 2014) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raj Kishor Prasad For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh-I(App) (In Cr.Misc. No.39976 of 2014) For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Raj Kumar Sinha For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anant Kumar (App) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR JHA ORAL ORDER 20-01-2015 These two bail applications arise out of Laheri P.S. Case No. 242 of 2013, therefore, they have been heard together and are being disposed of by this common order.

Patna High Court Cr.Misc. No.38072 of 2014 (3) dt.20-01-2015 2/2 Heard both sides.

The petitioners seek bail in a case registered for the offence under section 395 of the Indian Penal Code The petitioners are not named in the first information report. Name of the petitioners figured in the confessional statement of co-accused. The I.O. did not collect any tangible evidence to show the involvement of the petitioners except the confessional statement.

Considering the aforesaid facts, the above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) with two sureties of like amount each to the satisfaction of Chief Judicial magistrate Nalanda at Biharsharif in Laheri P.S. Case No. 242 of 2013.

(Prabhat Kumar Jha, J) M.Rahman/- U T