← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./49129/2019bail rejected

Sonu Rai v. The State Of Bihar

2019-08-06Mr. Justice Shivaji Pandey2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.49129 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-624 Year-2018 Thana- HAJIPUR District- Vaishali ====================================================== Sonu Rai, aged about 30 years, Male, Son of Raju Rai Resident of Village - Dighikala Purvi Ward No. 8, P.S.- Hajipur Sadar, District- Vaishali ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Pramod Kumar Verma For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Kumar Veerendra Narayan ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SHIVAJI PANDEY ORAL ORDER 06-08-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.

In this case, the petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Hajipur Town P.S. Case No. 624 of 2018 registered for offences under sections 302/34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 27 of the Arms Act.

As per prosecution case, the Informant on 3.9.2018 at about 9 PM got information that his son has got shot injury at his abdomen by some unknown miscreants. On receipt of such information, the Informant reached at the spot and took him to Sadar Hospital, Hajipur from where he was referred to Paras H.M.R.I. Hospital, Patna where he was declared dead. The name of the petitioner has transpired during investigation on the statement made by the co-accused.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.49129 of 2019(2) dt.06-08-2019 2/2 Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that other accused persons have been granted bail. The petitioner has got criminal antecedent as has been stated in paragraph no.3 of the present applicative. Looking to the entire facts and circumstances of the case as also the petitioner having criminal antecedent, this Court is not inclined to grant privilege of anticipatory bail to the petitioner.

Accordingly, the prayer for bail of the petitioner, above named, is rejected.

If the petitioner surrenders before the court below within a period of three weeks from today and makes a prayer for bail, the court below, without being prejudiced by this order, will pass orders in accordance with law taking into account that other accused persons have been granted bail. (Shivaji Pandey, J) rishi/- U T