Pintu Kumar Mahto @ Pintu Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.56997 of 2021 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-170 Year-2021 Thana- BAUNSI District- Banka ====================================================== PINTU KUMAR MAHTO @ PINTU KUMAR SON OF LATE RAM SWARATH MAHTO R/O VILLAGE- PATEPUR, BARIYA, WARD NO.- 08, DHANKAUL, P.S.- PATEPUR, DISTRICT- VAISHALI ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.Ravish Mishra For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr.Binod Kumar ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJANI KUMAR SHARAN ORAL ORDER 04-03-2022 Heard the parties.
Learned counsel for the petitioner undertakes to remove the defects within four weeks of resumption of normal court proceedings. In the eventuality of non-removal of defects within undertaken period, office will place the matter before the Bench. Petitioner apprehends his arrest in connection with a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 30(a)/32(2)/34 of the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act, 2018.
Altogether 2326.32 liters of India made foreign liquor is said to have been recovered from a truck and the driver and codriver were apprehended from the spot. It is confessed by the driver that he was carrying the illicit liquor on the instruction of
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56997 of 2021(2) dt.04-03-2022 2/3 the petitioner.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is quite innocent and has not committed any offence as alleged in the FIR. He has been falsely implicated in this case due to dirty village politics. Petitioner has neither been apprehended on the spot nor any incriminating article has been recovered from his conscious physical possession. His name transpired in this case only on the confession of co-acused. Petitioner has no concern either with the seized liquor or any trade of liquor. The recovery is said to have been made from a truck and the petitioner is neither the driver nor the owner of the same. There is no compliance of section 100 of the Cr.P.C. Petitioner has two criminal antecedents, as also mentioned in para-3 of this application.
Petitioner is agreed to deposit a sum of Rs. 10,00,00/- (Rupees One Lac) in the Juvenile Justice Fund, Bihar bearing Account No.35094613009, IFSC SBIN0000153, State Bank of India, Patna Secretariat Sinchai Bhawan Branch, Patna. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances, let the petitioner, named above, in the event of his arrest/surrender before the learned court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail, on furnishing bail
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.56997 of 2021(2) dt.04-03-2022 3/3 bonds of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Court below, where the case is pending/Successor court, in connection with Bounsi P.S. Case No.170 of 2021, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C, as also the following conditions:
(1) One of the bailors will be a close relative of the petitioner, who will give an affidavit giving genealogy as to how he is related with petitioner. He will also undertake to inform the Court if there is any change in the address of petitioner. (2) The bailor shall also state on affidavit that he will inform the Court concerned if the petitioner is implicated in any other case of similar nature and thereafter the Court below will be at liberty to initiate proceeding for cancellation of anticipatory bail on the ground of misuse.
The bail bond of the petitioner shall be accepted by the learned Court below on showing receipt of deposit of Rs.10,00,00/- (Rupees One Lac) in the Juvenile Justice Fund. (Anjani Kumar Sharan, J) pallavi/- U T