Pradeep Kumar @ Pradeep Kumar Sah v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No. 51625 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-112 Year-2024 Thana- DUMRAO District- Buxar ====================================================== 1.
Pradeep Kumar @ Pradeep Kumar Sah Son of Shatrudhan Sah @ Diwan Sah Resident of village and Post - Purana Bhojpur, Police Station - Dumraon, District - Buxar 2.
Pankaj Kumar @ Pankaj Kumar Gupta Son of Shatrudhan Sah @ Diwan Sah Resident of village and Post - Purana Bhojpur, Police Station - Dumraon, District - Buxar 3.
Amarjeet Kumar @ Amarjeet Kumar Gupta Son of Dwarika Sah Resident of village and Post - Purana Bhojpur, Police Station - Dumraon, District - Buxar 4.
Vindhyachal Sah Son of Late Baiju Sah Resident of village and Post - Purana Bhojpur, Police Station - Dumraon, District - Buxar ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr. Shailendra Kumar Choubey For the Opposite Party/s :
Mr. Jitendra Kumar Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SATYAVRAT VERMA ORAL ORDER 14-08-2024
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.P.P. for the State along with learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant.
2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 147, 148, 149, 341, 323, 324, 307, 447, 120(B) of the Indian Penal Code.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioners at the outset seeks permission to withdraw the anticipatory bail application with respect to petitioner no.4, Vindhyachal Sah.
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 51625 of 2024(2) dt.14-08-2024 2/3
4. Permission is accorded.
5. It is next submitted that petitioners have antecedent of one case and the allegation against the accused persons including the petitioners, in the F.I.R. is of causing injury by deadly weapon to the informant and his other family members. It is also submitted that injury report of five injured, namely, Satish, Rajiv, Ankur, Vinod and Sujeet is annexed with the anticipatory bail application and from perusal of the injury report, it would manifest that the injury suffered by the injured is simple in nature and the blow was not repeated. It is next submitted that informant also received injury and one of the injuries is lacerated wound size 2"x1/2"x1/6" on left parietal region, which is opined to be grievous but then allegation of assaulting the informant is against Shashikant, who is not a petitioner in the instant anticipatory bail application.
6. Learned A.P.P. for the State and the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the informant opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners but are not in a position to rebut the submission of the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners that the injury suffered by the injured is simple in nature and the blow was not repeated.
7. Considering the submissions made by the learned
Patna High Court CR. MISC. No. 51625 of 2024(2) dt.14-08-2024 3/3 counsel for the petitioners, the petitioners above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, be released on anticipatory bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned trial court where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Dumraon (Naya Bhojpur O.P.) P.S. Case No.112/2024, subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C. (Satyavrat Verma, J) amit/- U T