← Library
Patna High CourtCWJC/14384/2012disposed

Sunita Kumari v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

2018-10-10Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.14384 of 2012 ====================================================== Sunita Kumari Daughter Of Anaddeo Sardar Resident Of Village Hemantganj Gram Panchayat Daparkha, P.S. - Triveniganj, District - Supaul ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar

2. The Member, District Teacher Employment Appellate Authority, Supaul

3. The Block Education Extension Officer, Block Triveniganj Supaul

4. The Block Development Officer Block Triveniganj Supaul

5. Ramesh Ram Panchayat Sachiv-Cum-Secretary Panchayat Teacher Selection Committee Gram Panchayat Thalha Garhia North Block Triveniganj, District - Supaul

6. Shakuntala Devi The Mukhia Cum President Panchayat Teacher Selection Committe Gram Panchayat Thalha Garhi North Block Triveniganj, District - Supaul

7. Babita Kumari Daughter Of Devendra Ram Resident Of Village P.O. Thalha Garhia South Block Triveniganj, District - Supaul ... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate, For the Respondent/s :

Mr. Roy Shivaji Nath ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPADHYAY ORAL ORDER 10-10-2018 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and counsel appearing on behalf of the State.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present writ petition was filed against the decision of District Teachers Employment Appellate Tribunal, Supaul, contained an Annexure-4. He submits that now the State Appellate Authority is available against the decision of the District Teachers Employment Appellate Tribunal as Appellate forum and as such petitioner may be granted liberty to approach the State Appellate Authority.

Patna High Court CWJC No.14384 of 2012(5) dt.10-10-2018 2/2 In view of the above, the writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner, in case such appeal is filed by the petitioner within a period of one month from today along with copy of this order, the Appellate Authority will condone the delay in filing the appeal and entertain and decide expeditiously the same on its own merits in view of the pendency of the writ petition for last more than six years.

With the aforesaid the writ petition stands disposed of. (Anil Kumar Upadhyay, J) T.Kr./- U