← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./41825/2015dismissed

Kamal Kant Chaudhary v. State Of Bihar And ANR

2020-08-27Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS NO. 41825 of 2015 Arising out of PS. Case No.-214 Year -2015 Thana -Siwan City, District-Siwan ========================================================== Kamal Kant Chaudhary, son of Shri Yog Narayan Choudhary,resident of village - Sahuria, P.O. - Deohar, Police Station - Andhara Tharhi, District - Madhubani, at present posted as Deputy Commissioner, Commercial Taxes, Siwan Circle, Siwan. ..... ......Petitioner

Versus

1. The State of Bihar

2. Ashutosh Singh, son of late Lalan Singh, resident of village -Fatepur, Police StationSiwan Town, District - Siwan, the proprietor of R.L. Agency, Chapra Road, Police Station - Siwan Town, District - Siwan.

..... ......Opposite Parties ========================================================== Appearance:

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Umesh Kumar Mishra, Adv.

For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Ram Priya Sharan Singh, APP For the Informant :

Mr. Rajiv Kumar, Adv.

========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ASHUTOSH KUMAR ORAL ORDER 03.

27.08.2020.

Heard Mr. Umesh Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr. Rajiv Kumar, learned counsel for the informant and Mr. Ram Priya Sharan Singh, learned counsel for the State. This is an application seeking quashing of the F.I.R of Siwan Town P.S. Case No. 214 of 2015 dated 05.06.2015 instituted for the

offence under Sections 341, 323, 389, 511, 504, 506 and 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

On 21.03.2018, a bench of this Court had called for a report from the court below about the stage of the case, which has since been received and kept at flag 'X'. The report indicates that in this case cognizance has been taken on the basis of protest petition after accepting the final form and the case is pending for appearance of accused persons. In that view of the matter, there would be no necessity of pursuing with the present petition as it has become infructuous. This petition stands dismissed as having become infructuous. (Ashutosh Kumar, J) Sunil/- U T