Bijay Singh @ Bijay Prasad Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.43468 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-112 Year-2019 Thana- NAVINAGAR District- Aurangabad ====================================================== 1.

Bijay Singh @ Bijay Prasad Singh Son of Late Parasnath Singh Resident of Village - Sahejani, P.S.- Piro, Distt - Arrah (Bhojpur). 2.

Asha Devi Wife of Bijay Singh @ Bijay Prasad Singh Resident of Village - Sahejani, P.S.- Piro, Distt - Arrah (Bhojpur). 3.

Anita Devi Wife of Ram Narayan Singh Resident of Village - Sahejani, P.S.- Piro, Distt - Arrah (Bhojpur).

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ashok Kumar Singh For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Mohammed Arif ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRAKASH CHANDRA JAISWAL ORAL ORDER 09-09-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned APP for the State.

Petitioners apprehend their arrest in connection with Nabinagar P.S. Case No. 112 of 2019 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 498A/34 of the Indian Penal Code.

Petitioners along with other accused persons are said to have tormented the informant over dowry demand. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that the petitioners have no concern with the aforesaid occurrence. They have been falsely implicated in this

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.43468 of 2019(4) dt.09-09-2019 2/2 case. Petitioner no. 1 Bijay Singh @ Bijay Prasad Singh is the father-in-law, petitioner no. 2 Asha Devi is the mother-in-law and petitioner no. 3 Anita Devi is the gotni of the informant. They are living separately from the informant and her husband and have no concern with their affairs. They neither made any dowry demand nor ever tormented the informant. Allegation levelled against the petitioners is not specific rather general and omnibus in nature. Petitioners have no criminal antecedent. On the other hand, learned APP opposed the bail prayer of the petitioners.

In the facts and circumstances of the case, let the above named petitioners be released on bail, in the event of their arrest or surrender before the learned Court below within a period of six weeks from today, on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M. Aurangabad in connection with Nabinagar P.S. Case No. 112 of 2019, subject to the condition as laid down under Section 438 (2) of the Cr.P.C.

(Prakash Chandra Jaiswal, J) rohit/- U T