Amit Kumar v. The State Of Bihar
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.10854 of 2025 ====================================================== Amit Kumar Son of Bishnudeo Ray, Resident of village- Husenipur, P.O.- Paur, P.S.- Tisiauta, Block- Mahua, District - Vaishali at Hajipur. ... ... Petitioner/s
Versus
1.
The State of Bihar through the Additional Chief Secretary, Department of Cooperative, Government of Bihar, Patna.
2.
The Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Bihar, Patna. 3.
The District Magistrate -cum- District Election Officer (Cooperative), Vaishali at Hajipur, District- Vaishali at Hajipur. 4.
The District Cooperative Officer, Vaishali at Hajipur, District - Vaishali at Hajipur.
5.
The Block Cooperative Officer, Mahua, District - Vaishali at Hajipur. 6.
The Circle Officer, Mahua-cum- Returning Officer, Cooperative Election Mahua Block, District- Vaishali at Hajipur.
7.
The State Election Authority, Bihar Patna through the Chief Election Officer, Bihar, Patna.
8.
The Chief Election Officer, The State Election Authority, Bihar Patna. 9.
Govindpur Primary Agriculture Credit Cooperative Society, At and P.O.- Govindpur, P.S.- Tisiauta, Block - Mahua District- Vaishali at Hajipur through its Administrator -cum- Block Cooperative Officer, Mahua, District Vaishali at Hajipur.
... ... Respondent/s ====================================================== Appearance :
For the Petitioner/s :
Mr.S. B.K. Manglam, Advocate For the Respondent/s :
Mr.Government Pleader (13) ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK KUMAR SINHA ORAL ORDER 28-07-2025 Learned counsel, Mr. S.B.K. Mangalam, is present on behalf of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the State Election Authority as well as learned counsel for the State are also present.
2. Learned counsel, Mr.S.B.K. Manglam, submits that the petitioner has won the election and now this writ application
Patna High Court CWJC No.10854 of 2025(3) dt.28-07-2025 2/2 has become meaningless and hence he wants to withdraw the same.
3. In view of the fact that the petitioner has won the election, as submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ application is dismissed as withdrawn. (Alok Kumar Sinha, J) sanjeev/- U