Md. Sahid v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44970 of 2019 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-89 Year-2019 Thana- MOKAMAH District- Patna ====================================================== MD. SAHID Son of Md. Silajuddin @ Md. Sirajuddin Resident of Village - Chandmari, P.S.- Mokama, Distt - Patna.

... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Ashok Kumar Kashyap For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Rajendra Singh ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY PRIYA ORAL ORDER 24-07-2019 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned APP for the State.

The petitioner seeks bail in Mokama P. S. Case No. 89 of 2019 instituted for the offence under Section(s) 399, 402 and 414 of the IPC and sections 25(1-b)a, 26 and 35 of the Arms Act.

It is alleged that police during course of vehicle checking apprehended five persons including driver who were found sitting on the vehicle and tried to run away on seeing the police. It is alleged that police arrested five persons. It is further alleged that three live cartridges have been recovered from possession of petitioner.

Petitioner is in custody since 9.5. 2019 having clean antecedent.

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44970 of 2019(2) dt.24-07-2019 2/2 Keeping in view the clean antecedent of petitioner , let the petitioner, above named, be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/-(Ten thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the J.M. 1st Class, Barh, Patna , in connection with Mokama P. S. Case No. 89 of 2019 subject to the following conditions:- (i) Both the bailors shall be the close relative of the petitioner.

(ii) The petitioner shall be present on each and every date fixed by the Court and absence on two consecutive dates without valid reason will result in cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner.

(iii) If petitioner tamper with the evidence in the case, prosecution will be at liberty to move for cancellation of bail bond of the petitioner.

(Sanjay Priya, J) shyambihari/- U T