← Library
Patna High CourtCR. MISC./48577/2023allowed

Vikash Kumar @ Vikash Kumar Singh v. The State Of Bihar

2023-08-04Mr. Justice Sunil Kumar Panwar2 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.48577 of 2023 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-236 Year-2022 Thana- KUDHNI District- Muzaffarpur ====================================================== VIKASH KUMAR @ VIKASH KUMAR SINGH Son of Arvind Singh Resident of village - Gorihari, P.S. - Kudhani, Distt. - Muzaffarpur ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

THE STATE OF BIHAR ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr.Hari Kishore Thakur For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr.Pushpa Sinha ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SUNIL KUMAR PANWAR ORAL ORDER 04-08-2023 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner has prayed for bail in a case registered for the offence punishable under sections 341, 354B, 376, 511, 379, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

3. As per allegation in the FIR, with wrong intention petitioner had entered into the house of the informant and tried to outrage her modesty. On alarm being raised, he fled away from there and left his motorcycle in the house of the informant.

4. It is submitted by learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case due to dirty village politics. Victim/informant is a married lady aged about 25 years. Petitioner is co-villager of the informant. He was in drunken position and he had parked his motorcycle near

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.48577 of 2023(2) dt.04-08-2023 2/2 the house of the informant. He has not committed any wrong with the informant. As per submission of learned counsel for the petitioner, after prevailing good-sense, the matter has been compromised and now no grievance remains between them. Petitioner is languishing in judicial custody since 4.5.2023.

5. The application for bail is opposed by learned APP for the State.

6. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the facts and circumstances of the case, this court is inclined to enlarge the petitioner on bail. The above named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 10,000/- (Rs. ten thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned ACJM 1st West Muzaffarpur in connection with Kudhani Turki O.P. P.S. Cae No. 236 of 2022.

(Sunil Kumar Panwar, J) sushma/- U