Sonu Singh v. The State Of Bihar

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44613 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-82 Year-2024 Thana- CHHAURADANO District- East Champaran ====================================================== Sonu Singh S/O Ram Naresh Kuvar @ Ram Naresh Singh R/O VillageLatipur, Ward no. 03, P.S.- Bathnaha, District- Sitamarhi ... ... Petitioner/s

Versus

The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s :

Mr. Ravi Ranjan, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s :

Mr. Madhura Nand Jha, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE RUDRA PRAKASH MISHRA ORAL ORDER 21-07-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for the State.

2. The petitioner seeks bail in connection with Chhauradano P.S. Case No. 82 of 2024, instituted for the offences punishable under Sections 412/34 of the Indian Penal Code, read with Sections 25(1-B)(a), 26, 27 and 35 of the Arms Act.

3. The prosecution case, in short, is that, there is recovery of one country made pistol and three live cartridges from the possession of co-accused persons.

4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is innocent and has falsely been implicated in the present case. No incriminating material has been recovered from

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44613 of 2025(3) dt.21-07-2025 2/3 the conscious possession of the petitioner. Learned counsel for the petitioner also submits that the petitioner was not arrested on spot rather name of the petitioner has transpired in this case on the basis of confessional statement made by co-accused persons and the same has got no evidentiary value. It is further submitted that no any recovery of arms have been made from the possession of the petitioner. The petitioner is in custody since 02.07.2024 and has got seven criminal antecedents in which he is on bail. There is no compliance of Section 103 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.

5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the petitioner.

6. Considering the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case and taking into account the period of custody undergone by the petitioner, this Court is inclined to grant bail to the petitioner.

7. Let the petitioner be released on bail after framing of charge, if not already framed on furnishing bail bonds of Rs. 10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of Court below/concerned Court in connection with Chhauradano P.S. Case No. 82 of 2024, subject to the following conditions:

Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44613 of 2025(3) dt.21-07-2025 3/3 (I) One of the bailors shall be own/close member of the family of the petitioner.

(II) The petitioner shall appear on each and every date fixed at the trial. In case of default in such appearance on two consecutive dates, the Trial Court will have liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

(III) If the petitioner is found involved in similar nature of offence in future, the Trial Court will have the liberty to cancel the bail bonds of the petitioner.

(Rudra Prakash Mishra, J) Rajorshi/- U T