Riyanshu Prawal And ANR v. The State Of Bihar And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA

Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.19773 of 2013 ===========================================================

1. Riyanshu Prawal D/O Sri Ravi Kiran (Legal Guardian Of Riyamshu Prawal) R/O Village- Asnarayan Singh Market, P.O+ P.S- Paliganj, Distt- Patna (Bihar)

2. Shubha Priya S/O Sri Chandra Bhanu Singh (Legal Guardian Of Shubh Priya) R/O Village+ P.O- Achhua, P.S- Dulhin Bazar, Distt- Patna (Bihar) .... .... Petitioner/s

Versus

1. The State Of Bihar through Chief Secretary, Bihar, Patna.

2. The Principal Secretary, Human Resources Department, Bihar, Patna.

3. Secretary, Bihar School Examination Board, Patna. .... .... Respondent/s =========================================================== Appearance :

For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Ajit Kumar For the Respondent/s : Mr. Avnish Nandan Sinha =========================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY KUMAR TRIPATHI ORAL JUDGMENT Date: 28-09-2015 *************** 28.09.2015 Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The two petitioners filed this writ application for re-scrutiny of their Magahi answer-sheet for many a reasons indicated in the writ application. They are not satisfied with the evaluation done by the respondentauthorities, especially looking at the nature of performance over all in other subjects and papers. Since the respondents did not initially respond to their request, the writ application was filed, seeking a direction.

The Examination Board subjected the two copies of the petitioners for a scrutiny before the subject

Patna High Court CWJC No.19773 of 2013 dt.28-09-2015 2/2 expert and based on the reports a re-evaluation has been done by Professor Amarnath Sinha, the former Vice-Chancellor, who came to a considered opinion that Petitioner No. 1 deserves 80 marks and Petitioner No. 2 deserves 78. The reason for assessment of such marks and revision have also been indicated in the evaluationsheet itself. Based on the same, the results of the petitioners have been declared.

In view of the above, the basic relief, which the petitioners were seeking, has already accrued to them, so to that extent the petitioners have succeeded. So far as the other grievances that they miss out the scholarship etc., does not come within the ambit of adjudication of the present writ application. The writ application stands disposed off with observation as above.

(Ajay Kumar Tripathi, J.) U SKM/-